Five methods for blocking pirated sites (mechanisms, limits and problems)

Written By notebooktabletphone

At the beginning

 In April this year, the Japanese government was regarded as a voluntary initiative by private businesses in "emergency measures against pirated sites on the Internet", and three sites, "Manga Village", "Anitube", and "MIOMIO" and the same.It has stated that blocking is "appropriate" for the site.

海賊版サイトをブロッキングするための5つの手法(その仕組みと限界および問題点)

 The "blocking" described here is an act of forcibly blocking the communication operator (ISP) for Internet users to access specific content such as pirated sites, but legal basis.The non -connecting blockage is not allowed, and the legal stakeholders, consumer organizations, and Internet -related organizations have expressed the opposition, arguing that measures should be taken in non -blocking methods.

 Internet Society (ISOC) is an organization that supports the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) activities that formulate a sentence called the REQUEST FOR COMMENTS (RFC), which is the source of the Internet technical specifications, and mainly contribute to the development of the Internet.It is an international non -profit organization for the purpose of activities.

 In ISOC, using blocking to deal with illegal content and illegal activities is not inefficient and effective, and it causes unintended damage to Internet users, so it is the source of illegal content by international cooperation.[*1] [*2] has been argued that it should be dealt with by fundamental measures, such as deletion and identification of the sender.

 This time, the Internet Society Japan Branch (ISOC-JP) opposes the request for blocking access by blocking based on ISOC's claim.

 This article describes the technical limits of various blocking methods based on ISOC's views [*4] on the blocking of Internet content.